home.gif (1530 bytes)

Rock Island County Budget:  2013-2014

County Board Meeting

Hope Creek

Update Speech

The Oath I took

meet_drue.gif (2006 bytes)

Bill to Allow Courthouse Without Voter Ok

defending_our_rights.gif (4110 bytes)

meet_drue.gif (2006 bytes)

meet_drue.gif (2006 bytes)

 

County Board Meeting Information

Community Links

meet_drue.gif (2006 bytes)

other.gif (2715 bytes)

meet_drue.gif (2006 bytes)

Jim Wozniak Interview

                                                                  


   
I think most people would agree that our county is in trouble and we have to look at ALL options to address the courthouse issue.

I attended the last Vision for the Future Ad Hoc Committee meeting on Thursday, January 23, 2014 and asked the committee if the county board could be provided more options.  One option could be a bare bones minimum as a starting point

I asked that we look at addressing the lawsuit ONLY and to build courtroom facilities adjacent to the existing courthouse and near or adjacent to the existing justice center.  This would address the issue at hand and relieve the county from the threat of a lawsuit. 

How did we get here?

The current situation didn't just happen overnight. It is the result of years of neglect and inaction on the part of past county boards.  We are at the point where the can cannot be kicked down the road any longer.  

The Rock Island County Board was brought to the table due to a lawsuit from the judges to provide adequate courtroom facilities. 
 I stated to the committee that the March  $118 million cap that failed as a referendum differs very little from a $72 million referendum that was just proposed. 

I am told by the ad hoc committee renovating the court house is not cost effective. I would like to know what the cost of demolition and/or continued maintenance of a vacant building while efforts are made to find a usage?  Would that change the equation of renovation not being an option?  Also, is demolition desired by the public?  If it is not feasible, then if continued maintenance is required, then would that make renovation of the existing courthouse a more viable option?


January 19, 2014

We need more options for the courthouse-
-

Voting “no” to placing a $72 million courthouse referendum on March 2014 ballot was a vote for more options. We are working on establishing those options.

Ten months of research by the Visions for the Future ad hoc committee produced a $72 million recommendation for a referendum which is too costly. The recommendation said to build a new courthouse, fix the county office building, and leave the courthouse a vacant building. The space needs study data produced by the Vision committee has value, but the proposed referendum that came after is not the right answer.

We need to focus on the issue at hand- inadequate courtroom facilities. Now is not the time to roll the county office building into the equation and should not be part of the courthouse solution.

The referendum just proposed is very similar to the referendum placed on the ballot in April 2013. The only difference is that this went from "the blank check" cap for a public building commission of $110 Million to $72 Million. That 2013 courthouse referendum failed soundly.

Some county board members stated they voted “no” for fear that it would decrease the chances for the planned Hope Creek tax levy increase to pass in November. But one does not have to look further for a reason to turning down the courthouse referendum other than it is not the right answer. A better answer is needed that residents will want rather than a referendum that mirrors the failed referendum from last April and hoping that the voters will change their minds in one year's time.

Certainly, asking the judges to sue the county, after the county board voted the referendum proposal down, is not that answer. As county board members, we have a fiduciary duty to look out for the best interests of the county and the residents and we ask the judges to continue their patience as we look at more options. The current situation didn't just happen overnight. It is the result of years of neglect and inaction on the part of past county boards, before our tenure.

We are firmly committed to addressing the threat of a lawsuit and are working towards a solution that will address our county’s courthouse obligation during one of our county’s bleakest financial periods.

Chris Filbert- Rock Island County Board Member- District 1
Dr. Rod Simmer- Rock Island County Board Member- District 18
Drue Mielke- Rock Island County Board Member- District 22
Ron Oelke- Rock Island County Board Member- District 24
Bob Westpfahl- Rock Island County Board Member- District 25

 

 
 
   
   

 

 

 

Copyright © 2013 Friends of Drue Mielke